Monday, October 08, 2007

Catholic self-identity…necessary reemergence in our global society!


In a recent interview, Cardinal Avery Dulles alluded to what he considered the greatest difficulty the Catholic Church will face in the 21st century…that is the growing trend towards the lack of Catholic identity within our own Catholic Church. Perhaps the reason for this malaise is the fact that over the past four decades Catholic popular trends moved towards making all of our external signs and symbols…quite frankly generically Catholic neutral. What I mean by this is that in the 1960's and the 1970's there was a large movement to replace traditional Catholic modes of worship and celebration with somewhat "ecumenical" expressions of universal faith and global brotherhood, as opposed to Catholic Sacraments of richly imbued moments of theological signs and symbols of the Catholic Church's anciently rooted ceremonies. It seemed that no matter where one went to Mass, there was an attempt to subtly "neutralize" Catholic ritual and traditions in not only the Sacraments, but also in Catholic art and architecture as well. The result was often a bland cornucopia of ritual symbolism that often one had a hard time comprehending the sacredness of the actions, let alone the Catholicity of the celebration. Perhaps, the worst fear of the Catholic Church had been realized, even after great strides to avoid it…Modernism in its most revolutionary sense invaded and permeated our Catholic Sacraments and Liturgies. The modernization of the Roman Church as foreseen by the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council was compromised with institutional and sacramental barbarism that equaled the "sacking" of Rome centuries before. Catholic institutional strength and universal conformity since the Council of Trent was compromised and all of the forces of the liberal left took equal opportunities to dismantle the visible manifestations of Catholic traditional signs and symbols, actions and responses that made our faith uniquely independent from the generic celebrations of other faiths and denominations.

The fascination with liturgical space and its "renewal" according to the norms of the Second Vatican Council was instant…within a few years after the Council; parishes replaced their Altars, removed their Communion rails, silenced great organs and replaced them with strumming guitars and tambourines. Gregorian chant was replaced with refrains from Peter, Paul and Mary's latest hits, the priest celebrant became the "presider," and the Eucharistic Sacrifice of the Mass became commonly referred to as a "communal meal!" No wonder the threat of loosing our Catholic identity is so large a problem in the 21st century, we spent over 40 years dismantling our historically rooted notion of Church, only to replace it with Modernist examples of generic art and architecture that reflected the generic chaos of the contempory period and neglected to appreciate the transcendent nature of all of our Catholic signs and symbols.

The growing awakening and awareness of our Catholic history and ritual traditions is in this authors mind a great rebirth of the Catholic Church's awareness of it's need to uniquely herald the Gospel message through our sacred and transcendent signs and symbols, our eschatological mission to sanctify a temporal world that deeply needs and desires the inclusion of sacred rituals into global daily life. The modern Catholic in my estimation needs to boldly proclaim in sacramental words and ritual actions the presence of Jesus Christ in the world…and be visibly identified through our visibly Catholic sacraments and actions. One of the greatest dilemmas for the modern world is the conflict that is rising between Catholics and Moslems. This conflict is nothing new, but rather the resurgence of Islamic desire for theological dominance in the Western world. The Reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula from 711-1492, the rise of the Spanish Inquisition and the spread of European colonialism all stem from the perpetual struggle that exists between the theological nuances of East versus West. Islamic radicalism that threatens to engulf Europe, the Middle East and even the Western hemisphere now more than ever requires a strong Catholic restoration of it's sacramental identity and social purposes. Our Catholic Church is awakening from a slumber imposed by Modernism in the 20th century, and the need for Catholic resurgence of identity is perhaps the best cure for our global Catholic Church in the 21st century. The need to restore Catholic identity goes far beyond just the institutional signs and symbols of our ancient faith, there is a need for a rekindling of internal evangelization within Catholicism that hopefully will result in not only a global reevangelization of the non-Catholic world, but will provide an apologetical platform from which Catholic sacramental, social and ethical moral teachings will prevail in an increasing world of secularism and cultural homogeneity. Benedict XVI it seems understands the need for internal evangelization within the Catholic Church. His outreaching messages to youth in the Church make it plainly clear that the future of theological conversion within Catholicism is rooted deeply in a historically rooted appreciation of the radical call that the Gospel message and Catholic sacraments signify for the global development of the Western world.

I agree whole heartedly with the diagnosis that the constant thread of loosing our Catholic identity is perhaps the greatest difficulty that the Church of the 21st century will encounter. Thankfully, the direction we are taking as an institution now permits Catholics worldwide to experience Catholicism for not only it's historically significant contributions to the life and education of the world in the past, but the continuing contemporary message of Catholic moral, social and ethical teachings that will guide an ever needing society towards strong Catholic principles of moral certitude in a world that increasingly needs a strong Catholic expression of identity in an increasingly nihilistic world and society.

1 comments:

bill bannon said...

Sorry...but Rome and Popes never get blamed for a blessed thing in these analyses. And we'll never convert the most intelligent until we stop with this silence (Japan,China, India, Harvard, MIT, Carnegie Mellon....all the places we don't send missionaries or send them to no great effect percent wise). Catholic blogs criticize everything from liturgy to Bush but won't say a thing about a series of Popes who in certain areas undermined the Catholic identity. Casti Cannubii in sect. 74/1st sentence said that wifely obedience was a must and Pius XI therein linked its undermining to false prophets...and the word of God supported him in this in 6 explicit statements in the NT/ John Paul II undermined that by conflating the mutual submission of man and woman of only one passage..Ephesians...to the separate issue of wifely obedience (separate entirely in the pastorals which John Paul never quoted verbatim because they contradicted him). Then having effectively removed wifely obedience from our homilies and converse, he proceeded to announce that the catechism was a sure guide to the faith and it makes no mention at all of wifely obedience in an age when Catholic divorces are growing. And not one Catholic paid pundit says boo because we are a conformist culture to a fault (and part of that is financial and career conformism...would George Weigel have gotten the biography job had he spoke up on Papal inaction on sex abuse?). John Paul did the same thing on the death penalty. Catholics are told "the Church has always taught" when Rome wants to enforce something but when a Pope wants to reverse something, he cares not a bit for lineage as on the two above issues and he simply need allude to "developement" which can happen but not abruptly as on the two above issues.
And the Cardinal rank therefore cannot be really respected in a deep way as long as it is totally silent in the face of such issue abuses by Popes.
Then there was the sex abuse horror and we are to believe that no Pope has any responsibility for four decades of crimes even though not one Pope took any emergency action like Christ did when He made a whip and drove out the money changers from the gentile area of the temple.
Toynbee is polite in his Study of History but he rightly hints here and there that Catholicism has too much of the mimetic (parroting) and its creative minority has become rather an entrenched dominant minority. That is why we are never announcing the conversion of droves of people from the best universities in the world and that is why for all our self flattery, we do not have the best universities in the world. We're lucky if we can keep them from inviting pro choice speakers. Catholicism is too conformist to Rome even when Rome chooses to contradict the Rome of just decades ago (Pius XII affirmed the death penalty while having a safer modern penology than we have now).... conformist to Rome as on the two above issues of wifely obedience and the death penalty.